rubber duck: have holes in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, object
Weight: 0.53
, item
Weight: 0.53
, toy
Weight: 0.52
Siblings rubber stamp
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.33
, chicken leg
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have holes in them 1.00
has physical part holes 0.89
have hole in bottom 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rubber duck, have holes in them)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(rubber duck, have hole in bottom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rubber duck, have hole in bottom)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rubber duck, have hole in bottom)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rubber duck, have hole in bottom)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rubber duck, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rubber duck, have holes in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rubber duck, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rubber duck, have holes in them)