rubbish: be dangerous to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.48
, place
Weight: 0.47
, refuse
Weight: 0.46
, claim
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, garbage can
Weight: 0.32
, slag
Weight: 0.32
, compost
Weight: 0.31
, garbage truck
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous to animals 1.00
be dangerous to wild animals 0.94
be dangerous to humans 0.90
have impact on animals 0.80
be harm to humans 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(material, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(material, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(material, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(material, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(rubbish, be harm to humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(material, be dangerous to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(material, be dangerous to humans)