rubbish: be harm to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.48
, place
Weight: 0.47
, refuse
Weight: 0.46
, claim
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, garbage can
Weight: 0.32
, slag
Weight: 0.32
, compost
Weight: 0.31
, garbage truck
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harm to humans 1.00
be dangerous to humans 0.86
be dangerous to animals 0.78
have impact on animals 0.77
be dangerous to wild animals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(material, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(material, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(material, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(material, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(rubbish, be harm to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(material, be dangerous to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(material, be dangerous to humans)