rubbish: have impact on animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.48
, place
Weight: 0.47
, refuse
Weight: 0.46
, claim
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, garbage can
Weight: 0.32
, slag
Weight: 0.32
, compost
Weight: 0.31
, garbage truck
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have impact on animals 1.00
have impact 0.90
be dangerous to animals 0.80
affect people 0.78
be dangerous to wild animals 0.77
be harm to humans 0.77
affect environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(compost, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(compost, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(compost, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(rubbish, have impact)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, have impact)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(rubbish, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(rubbish, have impact)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, affect people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(rubbish, affect environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(rubbish, have impact)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, affect environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(rubbish, affect people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(rubbish, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(rubbish, affect people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rubbish, affect people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(rubbish, be harm to humans)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compost, affect environment)