rug: be find in hote

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.56
, piece
Weight: 0.52
Siblings doormat
Weight: 0.36
, carpet
Weight: 0.34
, tablecloth
Weight: 0.34
, broom
Weight: 0.33
, shoe
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be find in hote 1.00
be at roon 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rug, be find in hote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(carpet, be at roon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(rug, be find in hote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(carpet, be at roon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(carpet, be at roon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(rug, be find in hote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(rug, be find in hote)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rug, be find in hote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rug, be find in hote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rug, be find in hote)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(rug, be find in hote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rug, be find in hote)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rug, be find in hote) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(carpet, be at roon)