rug: is wet todd

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.56
, piece
Weight: 0.52
Siblings carpet
Weight: 0.34
, tablecloth
Weight: 0.34
, broom
Weight: 0.33
, shoe
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is wet todd 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rug, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpet, is wet todd)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rug, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpet, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carpet, is wet todd)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rug, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(rug, is wet todd)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(rug, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rug, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rug, is wet todd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rug, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rug, is wet todd)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rug, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(carpet, is wet todd)