rugby ball: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents american football
Weight: 0.63
, ball
Weight: 0.46
Siblings tennis ball
Weight: 0.35
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.35
, golf ball
Weight: 0.34
, cue ball
Weight: 0.34
, bowling ball
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality joke 0.80
go bad 0.79
provide good high performance 0.76
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(american football, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rugby ball, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(american football, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rugby ball, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(american football, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(american football, has quality joke)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(american football, has quality joke)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(american football, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality joke)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality joke)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(american football, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(american football, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tennis ball, go bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, has quality joke)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bowling ball, has quality joke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(rugby ball, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rugby ball, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(american football, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(american football, has quality joke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tennis ball, go bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bowling ball, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tennis ball, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tennis ball, has quality joke)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bowling ball, has quality joke)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(american football, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(rugby ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(american football, has quality joke)