rugby: be popular in south of france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.68
, game
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, team
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cricket
Weight: 0.37
, football team
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in south of france 1.00
be popular in france 0.95
be popular in georgia 0.82
be popular in argentina 0.81
be popular in uk 0.80
be popular in australia 0.78
be popular in wales 0.78
be very popular in australia 0.78
be big in argentina 0.76
be popular in zealand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cricket, be popular in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in france)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in france)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in france)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in france)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(rugby, be big in argentina)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(rugby, be big in argentina)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rugby, be big in argentina)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be big in argentina)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cricket, be popular in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)