rugby: be popular in wales

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.68
, game
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, team
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cricket
Weight: 0.37
, football team
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in wales 1.00
be important to wales 0.96
be national game of wales 0.88
be popular in uk 0.79
be popular in south of france 0.78
be popular in argentina 0.77
be popular in france 0.77
be popular in georgia 0.77
be popular in australia 0.75
be popular in zealand 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cricket, be popular in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rugby, be important to wales)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(rugby, be important to wales)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rugby, be important to wales)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rugby, be national game of wales)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(rugby, be national game of wales)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rugby, be national game of wales)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be important to wales)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be national game of wales)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in france)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in france)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in france)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in france)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cricket, be popular in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rugby, be popular in wales)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)