rugby: be popular in zealand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.68
, game
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, team
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cricket
Weight: 0.37
, football team
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in zealand 1.00
be popular in new zealand 0.98
be important to zealand 0.96
be important to new zealand 0.95
be popular in australia 0.85
be popular in uk 0.84
be very popular in australia 0.83
be popular in argentina 0.78
is uk 0.78
die in australia 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cricket, be popular in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rugby, be important to zealand)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rugby, be important to zealand)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rugby, be important to zealand)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(rugby, die in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rugby, die in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be important to zealand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rugby, die in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(rugby, die in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rugby, is uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(rugby, is uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rugby, is uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rugby, is uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cricket, be popular in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)