rule: be in aberration

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.64
, guideline
Weight: 0.64
, force
Weight: 0.64
, principle
Weight: 0.63
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.69
, mandate
Weight: 0.68
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65
, legislation
Weight: 0.64
, amendment
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in aberration 1.00
be regarded as aberration 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rule, be in aberration)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rule, be in aberration)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rule, be in aberration)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(rule, be regarded as aberration)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(rule, be in aberration)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rule, be regarded as aberration)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(rule, be in aberration)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(rule, be regarded as aberration)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(rule, be in aberration)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rule, be regarded as aberration)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(rule, be in aberration)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(rule, be in aberration)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rule, be in aberration)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rule, be in aberration)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(rule, be in aberration)