rum: be aged in used whiskey barrels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.74
, liquor
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.59
, commodity
Weight: 0.58
, beverage
Weight: 0.57
Siblings whiskey
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.38
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.38
, brandy
Weight: 0.38
, beer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be aged in used whiskey barrels 1.00
be aged in whiskey barrels 1.00
be cheaper than whiskey 0.82
be in dark bottles 0.76
is aged 0.76
be in bottles 0.76
be called white rum 0.76
be better than vodka 0.75
be called rum 0.75
is stored in bottles 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be better than vodka)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, be in bottles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is aged)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(beer, be in bottles)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beer, be in bottles)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(whiskey, be better than vodka)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be better than vodka)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(whiskey, is aged)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in whiskey barrels)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(rum, be aged in whiskey barrels)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(rum, be aged in whiskey barrels)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(rum, be aged in whiskey barrels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(rum, be called rum)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rum, be called rum)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rum, is aged)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rum, be better than vodka)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rum, be called white rum)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rum, is aged)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rum, be called white rum)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(rum, be called rum)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rum, is aged)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rum, be better than vodka)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(rum, be better than vodka)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rum, is aged)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rum, be called rum)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rum, be called white rum)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(rum, be called white rum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(beer, be in bottles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better than vodka)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(whiskey, is aged)