runner: need fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.54
, pedestrian
Weight: 0.52
Siblings winner
Weight: 0.62
, sprinter
Weight: 0.49
, haruki murakami
Weight: 0.45
, gymnast
Weight: 0.34
, wrestler
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need fat 1.00
need carbs 0.81
need protein 0.78
eat carbs before race 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sprinter, need protein)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sprinter, need protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sprinter, need protein)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(runner, need fat)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(runner, eat carbs before race)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(runner, eat carbs before race)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(runner, eat carbs before race)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(runner, eat carbs before race)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(runner, need protein)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(runner, need carbs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(runner, need carbs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(runner, need carbs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(runner, need protein)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(runner, need carbs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(runner, need protein)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(runner, need protein)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(runner, need fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(runner, need fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(runner, need fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(sprinter, need protein)