running: feel good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.59
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, motion
Weight: 0.57
, maneuver
Weight: 0.56
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, walking
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel good 1.00
is good thing 0.85
has quality good 0.80
seem get 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77
is too fast bad 0.76
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(running, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(running, feel good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(running, feel good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(walking, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(walking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(running, feel good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(running, feel good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(running, feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(walking, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(walking, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(walking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(walking, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(running, feel good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(running, seem get)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(running, seem get)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(running, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(running, seem get)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(running, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(running, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(running, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(running, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(running, is too fast bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(running, is too fast bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(running, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(running, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(running, seem get)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(running, feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(walking, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(walking, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(running, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)