running: has quality loss

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.59
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, motion
Weight: 0.57
, maneuver
Weight: 0.56
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, walking
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality loss 1.00
be for weight loss 0.86
has quality bad 0.79
is losing 0.78
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(running, has quality loss)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(running, has quality loss)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(running, has quality loss)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(walking, is losing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(walking, be for weight loss)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(walking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(running, has quality loss)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(running, has quality loss)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(running, has quality loss)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(walking, be for weight loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(walking, be for weight loss)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(walking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(walking, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(walking, is losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(walking, is losing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(running, has quality loss)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(running, be for weight loss)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(running, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(running, is losing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(running, be for weight loss)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(running, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(running, be for weight loss)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(running, be for weight loss)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(running, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(running, is losing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(running, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(running, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(running, is losing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(running, is losing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(running, has quality loss)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(walking, is losing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(walking, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(walking, be for weight loss)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(running, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)