running: is too fast bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.59
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, motion
Weight: 0.57
, maneuver
Weight: 0.56
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, walking
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is too fast bad 1.00
is very slow 0.84
is good thing 0.79
has quality bad 0.77
feel good 0.76
clear up too many plots 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(running, is too fast bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(walking, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(running, is too fast bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(walking, feel good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(walking, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(running, is too fast bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(running, is very slow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(running, is very slow)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(running, is very slow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(running, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(running, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(running, feel good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(running, feel good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(running, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(running, is very slow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(running, is too fast bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(walking, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(running, is too fast bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)