runt: is best dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, baby
Weight: 0.37
, story
Weight: 0.32
, everything
Weight: 0.31
, young
Weight: 0.24
Siblings chick
Weight: 0.31
, puppy
Weight: 0.31
, dog poop
Weight: 0.30
, big brother
Weight: 0.30
, beagle
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best dogs 1.00
is dogs 0.92
is best 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(runt, is best dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(runt, is dogs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(runt, is dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(runt, is dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(runt, is best)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(runt, is best)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(runt, is best)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(runt, is dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(runt, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(runt, is best dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(runt, is best dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(runt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)