rust: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents damage
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, color
Weight: 0.60
, disease
Weight: 0.58
, time
Weight: 0.56
Siblings mildew
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.33
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.33
, fatigue
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state problems 0.93
be problem in engineering 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fatigue, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fatigue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fatigue, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(rust, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rust, has state problems)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rust, has state problems)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rust, has state problems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(rust, be problem in engineering)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rust, be problem in engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rust, be problem in engineering)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rust, has state problems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rust, be problem in engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rust, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rust, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rust, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fatigue, has state problem)