sagitta: is agency management system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents constellation
Weight: 0.31
Siblings big dipper
Weight: 0.23
, orion
Weight: 0.23
, leo
Weight: 0.22
, andromeda
Weight: 0.22
, hydra
Weight: 0.22

Related properties

Property Similarity
is agency management system 1.00
agency 0.89
has state agency 0.89
has quality system 0.78
be important in system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hydra, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hydra, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(hydra, has quality system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sagitta, is agency management system)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sagitta, agency)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sagitta, has state agency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sagitta, has state agency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sagitta, agency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sagitta, agency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sagitta, has state agency)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sagitta, agency)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sagitta, has state agency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(sagitta, is agency management system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sagitta, is agency management system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(sagitta, is agency management system)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hydra, has quality system)