sailing: was dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.68
, water sport
Weight: 0.67
, hobby
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings rowing
Weight: 0.36
, boating
Weight: 0.36
, swimming
Weight: 0.35
, fishing
Weight: 0.35
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was dangerous 1.00
is dangerous 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sport, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sailing, was dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sport, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sport, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(swimming, is dangerous)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, is dangerous)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sport, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sailing, was dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fishing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fishing, is dangerous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(scuba diving, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(scuba diving, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(swimming, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(swimming, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sailing, was dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sailing, is dangerous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sailing, is dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(sailing, is dangerous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sailing, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sailing, was dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sport, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fishing, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(scuba diving, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(swimming, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sailing, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sport, is dangerous)