salad bowl: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, piece
Weight: 0.45
, vegetable
Weight: 0.44
, item
Weight: 0.43
Siblings spoon
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35
, dish
Weight: 0.34
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.32
, bottle opener
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00
be at in restaurant 0.99
be serve at most restaurant 0.86
be at resturant 0.85
be at salad bar 0.81
be at french restaurant 0.81
be at culinary store 0.77
be at buffet 0.77
be at store 0.77
be at kitchen 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at resturant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at kitchen)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at kitchen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spoon, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at resturant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(dish, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dish, be at resturant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(spoon, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at kitchen)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(dish, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dish, be at kitchen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(salad bowl, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at salad bar)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at french restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(salad bowl, be at french restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(salad bowl, be at french restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at kitchen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at buffet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(salad bowl, be at culinary store)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at culinary store)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(salad bowl, be at culinary store)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at culinary store)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at french restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(salad bowl, be at buffet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(salad bowl, be at kitchen)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at buffet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at kitchen)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(salad bowl, be at salad bar)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(salad bowl, be at buffet)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(salad bowl, be at kitchen)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at salad bar)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(salad bowl, be at salad bar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(dish, be at kitchen)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(spoon, be at kitchen)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(spoon, be at resturant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dish, be at resturant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(salad bowl, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)