salad: be at kitchen

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, snack
Weight: 0.59
, vegetarian
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at kitchen 1.00
be at restaurant kitchen 0.93
be at kitchen cupboard 0.91
be at your own kitchen 0.90
be at kitchen cabinet 0.90
be cook on stove 0.84
be at dishwasher 0.81
be at fridge 0.80
be at refrigerator 0.80
be cook in grill 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dish, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(dish, be at kitchen cabinet)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dish, be at fridge)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(meal, be cook on stove)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(dish, be at dishwasher)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be at kitchen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(meal, be cook on stove)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(dish, be at dishwasher)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(dish, be at kitchen cabinet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dish, be at kitchen)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dish, be at fridge)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(meal, be cook on stove)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at dishwasher)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at kitchen)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at kitchen cabinet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at fridge)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(taco, be at fridge)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dish, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(dish, be at kitchen cabinet)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dish, be at fridge)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(meal, be cook on stove)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(dish, be at dishwasher)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(taco, be at fridge)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(taco, be at fridge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(salad, be at kitchen)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(salad, be at refrigerator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at refrigerator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(salad, be at refrigerator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(salad, be at fridge)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at fridge)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(salad, be at fridge)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(salad, be at fridge)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(salad, be at refrigerator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be at kitchen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(dish, be at kitchen)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dish, be at kitchen cabinet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(dish, be at fridge)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meal, be cook on stove)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dish, be at dishwasher)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(taco, be at fridge)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(dish, be at kitchen)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dish, be at kitchen cabinet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(dish, be at fridge)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meal, be cook on stove)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dish, be at dishwasher)