salad: be expensive in restaurants

Related concepts

Parents	meal Weight: 0.71 , accompaniment Weight: 0.70 , entree Weight: 0.69 , dish Weight: 0.64
Siblings	potato salad Weight: 0.82 , fruit salad Weight: 0.77 , potato Weight: 0.67 , taco Weight: 0.65 , red cabbage Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be expensive in restaurants	1.00
taste better in restaurants	0.89
taste better at restaurants	0.89
be more expensive than burgers	0.82
be at schools expensive	0.78
is expensive	0.78
cost more than burgers	0.78
be more expensive than meat	0.78
is more expensive	0.77
get to shops	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(meal, be at schools expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(meal, be at schools expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(meal, be at schools expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(meal, be at schools expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(salad, taste better at restaurants)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than meat)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than meat)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(salad, is expensive)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(salad, cost more than burgers)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(salad, is expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(salad, cost more than burgers)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(salad, is expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(salad, is expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(salad, cost more than burgers)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than burgers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(meal, be at schools expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(meal, be at schools expensive)