salad: be more expensive than burgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.82
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than burgers 1.00
cost more than burgers 0.97
cost more than hamburgers 0.91
be more expensive than meat 0.87
be more expensive than cabbage 0.82
be healthier than other potatoes 0.82
be expensive in restaurants 0.82
be healthier than potatoes 0.82
be more expensive than white cabbage 0.82
be healthier than white potatoes 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(potato, be healthier than potatoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(potato, be healthier than potatoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)