salad: be more expensive than meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.82
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than meat 1.00
be more expensive than burgers 0.87
be more expensive than cabbage 0.86
is more expensive 0.86
be more expensive than white cabbage 0.85
be healthier than other potatoes 0.84
cost more than burgers 0.84
be harder than potatoes 0.84
be better than potatoes 0.84
be harder than white potatoes 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than potatoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(potato, be better than potatoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than meat)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)