salad: cost more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.82
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost more 1.00
is more expensive 0.85
cost more than hamburgers 0.82
cost more than burgers 0.81
be more expensive than meat 0.77
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(salad, cost more)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(salad, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(salad, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(salad, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(salad, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(salad, cost more)