salad: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.82
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
taste good 0.97
taste sweet 0.89
taste bitter 0.87
taste raw 0.85
taste disgusting raw 0.85
smell bad 0.84
taste better in restaurants 0.84
taste better at restaurants 0.83
taste like dirt 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(salad, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dish, smell bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(dish, smell bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste sweet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(salad, taste bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(potato, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, taste good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(potato, taste sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(potato, taste sweet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(salad, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(salad, taste good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(salad, taste good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(salad, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(salad, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dish, smell bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(potato, taste sweet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(salad, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dish, smell bad)