salad: taste better at restaurants

Property	Similarity
taste better at restaurants	1.00
taste better in restaurants	0.99
be expensive in restaurants	0.89
taste good	0.85
taste bad	0.83
be more expensive than burgers	0.80
is good food	0.79
make dish healthier	0.79
taste sweet	0.78
cost more than burgers	0.78

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(salad, taste bad)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(salad, taste bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(salad, taste good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(salad, taste bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(salad, taste good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(salad, cost more than burgers)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(salad, taste good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(salad, cost more than burgers)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(salad, taste good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(salad, cost more than burgers)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than burgers)

Parents	meal Weight: 0.71 , accompaniment Weight: 0.70 , entree Weight: 0.69 , dish Weight: 0.64
Siblings	potato salad Weight: 0.82 , fruit salad Weight: 0.77 , potato Weight: 0.67 , taco Weight: 0.65 , red cabbage Weight: 0.64

salad: taste better at restaurants

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings