salad: taste better in restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.82
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better in restaurants 1.00
taste better at restaurants 0.99
be expensive in restaurants 0.89
taste good 0.85
taste bad 0.84
be more expensive than burgers 0.79
make dish healthier 0.79
is good food 0.79
taste sweet 0.78
taste raw 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste sweet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(potato, taste good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, taste good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(potato, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(potato, taste sweet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(salad, taste bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(salad, taste bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(salad, taste good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(salad, taste bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(salad, taste good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(salad, taste good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(potato, taste sweet)