salamander: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, reptile
Weight: 0.61
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.38
, endangered species
Weight: 0.38
, frog
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, otter
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vertebrate, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(salamander, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vertebrate, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salamander, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tree frog, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(salamander, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(salamander, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vertebrate, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tree frog, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(salamander, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vertebrate, has quality questions)