salamander: protect themself from danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, reptile
Weight: 0.61
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.38
, endangered species
Weight: 0.38
, frog
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, otter
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
protect themself from danger 1.00
protect themselves 0.85
defend themselves 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reptile, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(salamander, protect themself from danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(reptile, defend themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(reptile, defend themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reptile, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(salamander, protect themself from danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tree frog, defend themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(salamander, protect themself from danger)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(salamander, protect themselves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(salamander, protect themselves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(salamander, defend themselves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salamander, protect themselves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(salamander, defend themselves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(salamander, defend themselves)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(salamander, protect themselves)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(salamander, defend themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(salamander, protect themself from danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(salamander, protect themself from danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(reptile, defend themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tree frog, defend themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(salamander, protect themself from danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(reptile, defend themselves)