sale: have called regressive taxes taxes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conversion
Weight: 0.63
, disposition
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings auction
Weight: 0.68
, revenue
Weight: 0.61
, purchase
Weight: 0.59
, clearance
Weight: 0.57
, free
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
have called regressive taxes taxes 1.00
have regressive taxes 0.99
have called taxes taxes 0.95
have taxes 0.94
tax 0.90
lowering taxes 0.84
be raised through taxes 0.83
have taxed commissions 0.79
be from texas gasoline tax 0.79
compulation of capital gain tax 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(revenue, lowering taxes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be raised through taxes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(purchase, compulation of capital gain tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(revenue, lowering taxes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(revenue, lowering taxes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(purchase, compulation of capital gain tax)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(purchase, compulation of capital gain tax)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(revenue, be raised through taxes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(revenue, be raised through taxes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sale, have regressive taxes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sale, tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sale, have regressive taxes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sale, tax)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sale, tax)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sale, have regressive taxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(revenue, lowering taxes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(revenue, be raised through taxes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(purchase, compulation of capital gain tax)