sale: have good jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conversion
Weight: 0.63
, disposition
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings auction
Weight: 0.68
, revenue
Weight: 0.61
, purchase
Weight: 0.59
, clearance
Weight: 0.57
, free
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
have good jobs 1.00
have jobs 0.96
have hard jobs 0.95
has state jobs 0.92
have stressful jobs 0.84
job 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(subject, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sale, have good jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(subject, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(subject, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(clearance, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(subject, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sale, have good jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(clearance, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(clearance, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(sale, have good jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(sale, job)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sale, job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sale, job)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sale, job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sale, have good jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sale, have good jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(subject, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(clearance, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sale, have good jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(subject, has state jobs)