sale: tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conversion
Weight: 0.63
, disposition
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings auction
Weight: 0.68
, revenue
Weight: 0.61
, purchase
Weight: 0.59
, clearance
Weight: 0.57
, free
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
tax 1.00
have called taxes taxes 0.92
have taxes 0.92
have called regressive taxes taxes 0.90
compulation of capital gain tax 0.87
have regressive taxes 0.86
lowering taxes 0.82
be from texas gasoline tax 0.82
be raised through taxes 0.81
be from texas gasoline tax declining 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(revenue, lowering taxes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax declining)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(purchase, compulation of capital gain tax)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be raised through taxes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(revenue, lowering taxes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(revenue, lowering taxes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax declining)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax declining)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(purchase, compulation of capital gain tax)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(purchase, compulation of capital gain tax)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(revenue, be raised through taxes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(revenue, be raised through taxes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sale, tax)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sale, have regressive taxes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sale, have regressive taxes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sale, have regressive taxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sale, tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(revenue, lowering taxes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax declining)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(revenue, be raised through taxes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(purchase, compulation of capital gain tax)