salesman: be at car show

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, people
Weight: 0.59
, con artist
Weight: 0.57
, film
Weight: 0.53
Siblings stockbroker
Weight: 0.46
, salesperson
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, plumber
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at car show 1.00
show car on lot 0.92
design car 0.77
deal car 0.76
price out new car 0.76
fix break engine of car 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, fix break engine of car)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design car)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, fix break engine of car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(engineer, fix break engine of car)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(engineer, design car)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(salesman, be at car show)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(salesman, show car on lot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(salesman, price out new car)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(salesman, show car on lot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(salesman, show car on lot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(salesman, deal car)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(salesman, deal car)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(salesman, price out new car)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(salesman, price out new car)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salesman, price out new car)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(salesman, deal car)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(salesman, deal car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(salesman, be at car show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(salesman, be at car show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(engineer, design car)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(salesman, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(engineer, fix break engine of car)