salesman: show car on lot

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, people
Weight: 0.59
, con artist
Weight: 0.57
, film
Weight: 0.53
Siblings stockbroker
Weight: 0.46
, salesperson
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, plumber
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
show car on lot 1.00
be at car show 0.92
charge lot 0.79
wants to have fun on job 0.77
deal car 0.76
price out new car 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(salesman, show car on lot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to have fun on job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(plumber, charge lot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(salesman, show car on lot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(plumber, charge lot)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(plumber, charge lot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(salesman, show car on lot)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(salesman, be at car show)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(salesman, price out new car)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(salesman, be at car show)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(salesman, be at car show)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(salesman, be at car show)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(salesman, deal car)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(salesman, price out new car)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(salesman, deal car)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(salesman, price out new car)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salesman, price out new car)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(salesman, deal car)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(salesman, deal car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(salesman, show car on lot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(employee, wants to have fun on job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plumber, charge lot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(salesman, show car on lot)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(employee, wants to have fun on job)