salesperson: be at toy store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.70
, broker
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.67
, sale
Weight: 0.56
Siblings salesman
Weight: 0.37
, receptionist
Weight: 0.36
, buyer
Weight: 0.35
, office worker
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at toy store 1.00
be at store 0.84
be at shop 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, be at store)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(salesperson, be at toy store)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, be at store)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(salesperson, be at toy store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sale, be at store)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sale, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sale, be at store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sale, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(salesman, be at toy store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(salesman, be at store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salesman, be at shop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, be at store)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, be at store)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(salesman, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(salesman, be at toy store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(salesman, be at store)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(salesman, be at store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salesman, be at shop)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(salesman, be at shop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(salesperson, be at toy store)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(salesperson, be at store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(salesperson, be at shop)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(salesperson, be at shop)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at shop)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(salesperson, be at shop)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(salesperson, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(salesperson, be at store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(salesperson, be at toy store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(sale, be at store)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(sale, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(salesman, be at store)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(salesman, be at toy store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(salesman, be at shop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(sale, be at store)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(salesperson, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(sale, be at store)