:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, go bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(guacamole, go bad)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(salsa, go bad)
Similarity expansion
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(salsa, is damn good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(salsa, is damn good)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(salsa, go bad)
Typical implies Plausible
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(salsa, go bad)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(potato salad, go bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(salsa, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(guacamole, go bad)