salt shaker: have less holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings salt water
Weight: 0.36
, rock salt
Weight: 0.36
, raw material
Weight: 0.34
, calcium hydroxide
Weight: 0.33
, sponge
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have less holes 1.00
have more holes 0.98
have different holes 0.93
has physical part holes 0.89
have one hole 0.88
have 1 hole 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, has physical part holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sponge, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(sponge, has physical part holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(salt shaker, have less holes)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(salt shaker, have more holes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(salt shaker, have more holes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(salt shaker, have more holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(salt shaker, has physical part holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(salt shaker, have different holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(salt shaker, has physical part holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(salt shaker, have different holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(salt shaker, have different holes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(salt shaker, has physical part holes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt shaker, have one hole)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(salt shaker, have 1 hole)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(salt shaker, have 1 hole)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(salt shaker, have one hole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(salt shaker, have 1 hole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(salt shaker, has physical part holes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(salt shaker, have different holes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(salt shaker, have more holes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(salt shaker, have one hole)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(salt shaker, have 1 hole)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(salt shaker, have one hole)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(salt shaker, have less holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(salt shaker, have less holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(salt shaker, have less holes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sponge, has physical part holes)