salt: be at fast-food restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.61
, spice
Weight: 0.60
, bad food
Weight: 0.60
, crystal
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gypsum
Weight: 0.56
, ice cream
Weight: 0.34
, grain
Weight: 0.34
, junk food
Weight: 0.34
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at resturant 0.85
be at hotel 0.80
be at kitchen 0.76
be at grocery store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dish, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(salt, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(salt, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bad food, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(salt, be at fast-food restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dish, be at resturant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bad food, be at hotel)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dish, be at kitchen)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(bad food, be at hotel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at kitchen)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at grocery store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bad food, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dish, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(junk food, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at grocery store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(salt, be at fast-food restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(salt, be at resturant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(salt, be at resturant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at resturant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(salt, be at resturant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(salt, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(dish, be at kitchen)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dish, be at resturant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bad food, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice cream, be at grocery store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be at grocery store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(dish, be at kitchen)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dish, be at resturant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(salt, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bad food, be at hotel)