salt: be used in food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seasoning
Weight: 0.62
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.61
, residue
Weight: 0.61
, spice
Weight: 0.60
Siblings gypsum
Weight: 0.56
, ice cream
Weight: 0.34
, garlic
Weight: 0.34
, grain
Weight: 0.34
, potato salad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in food 1.00
is food 0.92
is is food 0.91
get in food 0.91
be used in foods 0.87
be added to food 0.87
make food better 0.85
is food group 0.83
get cooked out of food 0.83
is is food of children 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spice, is food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(salt, be used in food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(spice, be added to food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(salt, be used in food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, get cooked out of food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(salt, be used in food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(spice, is food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(spice, be added to food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(spice, get cooked out of food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(spice, get cooked out of food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(spice, be added to food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, is food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gypsum, be added to food)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(grain, is food group)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spice, is food)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(salt, be used in food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(spice, be added to food)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(salt, be used in food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, get cooked out of food)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(salt, be used in food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(gypsum, be added to food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(gypsum, be added to food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(grain, is food group)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(grain, is food group)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(salt, be used in food)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(salt, get in food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(salt, be added to food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(salt, be added to food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(salt, get in food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(salt, get in food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(salt, get in food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(salt, be added to food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(salt, be added to food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(salt, be used in food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(spice, is food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(spice, be added to food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, get cooked out of food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(gypsum, be added to food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(grain, is food group)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(spice, is food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(spice, be added to food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(salt, be used in food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, get cooked out of food)