sample: be good size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.61
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, picture
Weight: 0.58
, option
Weight: 0.58
Siblings urine
Weight: 0.67
, stool
Weight: 0.55
, wafer
Weight: 0.53
, raw material
Weight: 0.34
, colloid
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good size 1.00
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wafer, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wafer, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wafer, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(sample, be good size)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sample, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sample, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sample, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sample, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sample, be good size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sample, be good size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sample, be good size)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wafer, has quality good)