samsung: be better than apple

Property	Similarity
be better than apple	1.00
be than apple	0.97
be worse than apple	0.96
be bigger than apple	0.95
be more popular than apple	0.94
be cheaper than apple	0.93
make apple parts	0.87
make fun of apple	0.87
is apple competition	0.84
be better than huawei	0.82

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(samsung, be worse than apple)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(samsung, be than apple)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(samsung, be than apple)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(samsung, be than apple)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(samsung, be worse than apple)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than apple)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than apple)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than apple)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(samsung, be than apple)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more popular than apple)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(samsung, be bigger than apple)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(samsung, be more popular than apple)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(samsung, be bigger than apple)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than apple)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(samsung, make apple parts)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(samsung, be more popular than apple)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(samsung, be bigger than apple)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(samsung, be bigger than apple)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(samsung, be more popular than apple)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(samsung, make apple parts)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(samsung, make apple parts)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(samsung, make apple parts)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(samsung, is apple competition)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(samsung, make fun of apple)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(samsung, is apple competition)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(samsung, make fun of apple)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(samsung, make fun of apple)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(samsung, make fun of apple)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(samsung, be better than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)

Parents	mobile phone Weight: 0.68 , player Weight: 0.63 , client Weight: 0.62 , name Weight: 0.60
Siblings	iphone Weight: 0.68 , nokia Weight: 0.38 , motorola Weight: 0.36 , dvd player Weight: 0.36 , smartphone Weight: 0.35

samsung: be better than apple

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible