samsung: be better than huawei

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than huawei 1.00
be better than apple 0.82
be better than iphone 0.81
be worse than apple 0.79
be bigger than apple 0.78
be superior in way 0.77
be more expensive than iphone 0.77
be cheaper than apple 0.76
be cheaper than iphone 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than apple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(samsung, be superior in way)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(samsung, be superior in way)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(samsung, be superior in way)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be superior in way)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)