samsung: be better than iphone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than iphone 1.00
be more expensive than iphone 0.95
be cheaper than iphone 0.95
produce parts for iphone 0.88
be better than huawei 0.81
be better than apple 0.79
stop paid apps in april 0.79
be cheaper than apple 0.78
be called samsung 0.76
be worse than apple 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(samsung, be called samsung)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than apple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(samsung, produce parts for iphone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(samsung, be called samsung)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(samsung, produce parts for iphone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, stop paid apps in april)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(samsung, stop paid apps in april)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(samsung, stop paid apps in april)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(samsung, be called samsung)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(samsung, stop paid apps in april)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(samsung, produce parts for iphone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(samsung, produce parts for iphone)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be called samsung)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)