samsung: be better than iphones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than iphones 1.00
be better than phones 0.85
be better than other phones 0.85
have many phones 0.79
have phones 0.78
make many phones 0.78
make money from smartphones 0.78
make phones 0.78
create phones 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be better than other phones)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nokia, make phones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(iphone, be better than other phones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(iphone, be better than other phones)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nokia, make phones)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nokia, make phones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than iphones)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than other phones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than other phones)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than other phones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than other phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than iphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nokia, make phones)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(iphone, be better than other phones)