samsung: be cellphones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cellphones 1.00
have phones 0.87
make phones 0.86
have many phones 0.85
make many phones 0.84
create phones 0.83
be better than phones 0.81
be better than other phones 0.81
make money from smartphones 0.80
be laptops 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nokia, make phones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be better than other phones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nokia, make phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nokia, make phones)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(iphone, be better than other phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(iphone, be better than other phones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(samsung, be cellphones)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than other phones)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than other phones)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than other phones)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than other phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cellphones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(samsung, be cellphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nokia, make phones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cellphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(iphone, be better than other phones)