samsung: be worse than apple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than apple 1.00
be better than apple 0.96
be than apple 0.93
be bigger than apple 0.93
be cheaper than apple 0.91
be more popular than apple 0.91
make apple parts 0.84
make fun of apple 0.83
is apple competition 0.80
be better than huawei 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(samsung, be worse than apple)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be than apple)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(samsung, be than apple)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(samsung, be than apple)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more popular than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(samsung, be more popular than apple)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than apple)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(samsung, make apple parts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(samsung, be than apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(samsung, make apple parts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(samsung, be more popular than apple)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than apple)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(samsung, make fun of apple)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(samsung, make apple parts)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(samsung, be more popular than apple)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than huawei)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(samsung, make apple parts)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(samsung, make fun of apple)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(samsung, make fun of apple)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(samsung, make fun of apple)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than huawei)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than huawei)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than huawei)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(samsung, be worse than apple)