samsung: is apple competition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is apple competition 1.00
be than apple 0.87
be better than apple 0.84
make fun of apple 0.84
be more popular than apple 0.83
be bigger than apple 0.82
be cheaper than apple 0.82
make apple parts 0.82
be worse than apple 0.80
copy apple 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(samsung, is apple competition)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(samsung, be than apple)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(samsung, be than apple)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be than apple)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(samsung, be more popular than apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(samsung, be than apple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(samsung, make apple parts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(samsung, be worse than apple)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(samsung, make fun of apple)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more popular than apple)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(samsung, make apple parts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than apple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(samsung, be more popular than apple)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(samsung, make apple parts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(samsung, be better than apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(samsung, be more popular than apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(samsung, be bigger than apple)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(samsung, make apple parts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(samsung, copy apple)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(samsung, make fun of apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(samsung, make fun of apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(samsung, copy apple)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(samsung, copy apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(samsung, make fun of apple)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(samsung, copy apple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is apple competition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(samsung, is apple competition)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(samsung, is apple competition)