samsung: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be more expensive than iphone 0.79
be more expensive in korea 0.78
be cheaper than apple 0.77
be expensive in korea 0.76
be cheaper than iphone 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(samsung, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(samsung, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nokia, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(samsung, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(samsung, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(iphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iphone, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(nokia, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nokia, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(samsung, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(samsung, be more expensive in korea)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(samsung, be more expensive in korea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(samsung, be expensive in korea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(samsung, be expensive in korea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(samsung, be more expensive in korea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(samsung, be expensive in korea)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive in korea)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be expensive in korea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(samsung, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(client, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nokia, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iphone, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(client, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(samsung, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)